Thursday 29 August 2013

The Facts: Syria and Civil Wars

The Facts

Syria and Civil Wars

Whilst the United States, Britain, and France ponders the most effective military  punishment to dish to the Syrian government for purported use of chemical weapon against its people in the suburb of  Muadhamiya the historical facts about modern day Syria and President Bashar El Assad and civil wars should not be lost.  Here is a brief summary of those facts:

Historical Facts:
It is good and well for Prime Minister Cameron to call the House of Common back to get a vote authorising the use of force against Syria.  Perhaps in fairness before the House of Common votes on any motion authorising the use of force the House should debate another motion questioning Britain’ historical liability and blame for what is happening in modern day Syria. The indisputable fact is that after the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1918 Britain ruled and influenced the future course of Syria for good 25 years before Syria became independent country.  In order to oppose Arab Nationalism led from the Hijaz after the war Britain encouraged minor Islamic sects such as the Alawites (Nusayri Shia) to enroll and train in the army and air force. El Assad Family was amongst other families and candidates that took advantage of the opportunity.  

If Prime Minister Cameron chooses to ignore history and Britain’ historical liability for modern day Syria and obtain a vote in the House of Common authorizing bombardment of Damascus.  History will judge Britain harshly regardless whether the House votes on a motion authorizing use of force for the sole reason of Assad purported use of chemical weapon or Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Civil Wars:
The current death toll in Syria is some 100,000 or more likely 150,000 killed and some 2 plus million people on the move to neighbouring countries and internally.  The population of Syria is around 24 million people.  The war officially started in March 2011.  The percentage death in Syria to date taking a death toll of 150,000 is 0.63% of the population.

Between 1860 and 1864 America, the mighty USA, went through civil war between North and South.  In 1860 America’s population was in the region of 34 million.  The death toll was in excess 750,000 which represent 2.2% of the population which about 3.5 times of the death toll to date in Syria.

Between 1975 and 1990 Lebanon was embroiled in civil war.  The death toll during the 15 plus years civil war was 220,000. As at 1975 the population of Lebanon was in the region of 3 million.  The percentage death is whopping 7.3 of the population which is some 11.6 times the death toll to date in Syria.

Accordingly on any count taking either the American or the Lebanese civil wars as a guide Syria got lot of catching up to do.

Finally one should not lose sight of the fact that epidemics that could be spread by flea, mosquitoes, and rodents can kill substantial percentage of any population.

The risk involved in the USA, Britain, and France jointly bombarding Damascus should not be under estimated.  Each of the three religions that inhabit the Middle East sees the endgame and salvation in Jerusalem.  Control of Jerusalem is therefore a priority.
  
……………………………

Saturday 10 August 2013

WTF JURY VERDICT

UNIQUE JURY VERDICT
Dubbo District Court
Regina -v - Palmertson

This jury verdict is from the annals of the history of criminal law in the State of New South Wales Australia.  The trial to which the verdict pertain took place well over 120 years ago during the regain of Queen Victoria in Dubbo District Court.  Dubbo is some 400 kilometer Northwest of Sydney. Nowadays Dubbo is thriving centre for agriculture and beef and farm machinery.

The jury consisted of 12 people (7 men, 5 women) selected from a panel of jurors.  The accused was a man named Palmertson.  The indictment alleges that Palmertson stole a healthy milking cow. If convicted, Palmertson custodial faced custodial sentence up to 10 year penal servitude.  

After a four days trial and addresses by the prosecutor and defence counsel the trial judge summed up the evidence to the jury and asked them to deliberate and come to a verdict of either Mr Palmertson guilty of the offence as charged in the indictment or not guilty.  Some four hours later the jury came back to Court with a verdict:

Judge’ Associate:    ‘Mr foreman has the jury reached a verdict?’

Jury Foreman:        ‘We have Your Honour’

Judge’ Associate:    ‘Do you find the accused guilty as charged?’

Jury Foreman:        ‘We find the accused not guilty if he returns the cow’

Trial Judge:        ‘This is the most bizarre verdict I have ever heard in my many years on the Bench.  It is not a verdict.  You go back to your deliberation and come up with a verdict of either ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty as charged’.

The trial judge again gave the jury brief summing up of the evidence and the elements of the offence to which they need to be satisfied and sent them on their way back to the jury room to deliberate and come up with guilty or not guilty verdict.

Within an hour of being addresse


d by the judge the jury came back with a verdict:

Judge’ Associate:    ‘Mr foreman has the jury reached a verdict?’

Jury Foreman:        ‘We have Your Honour’

Judge’ Associate:    ‘Do you find the accused guilty as charged?’

Jury Foreman:        ‘We find the accused not guilty and he can keep the cow!’